Empire's Fall

August 20, 2012 marked twenty one year anniversary of the day when tanks rolled through the streets of Moscow. It was a fateful day indeed, which caused a disastrous chain reaction within the bolshevik empire when each of the Soviet republics declared their sovereignty. Unlike the American colonies of the British crown in the 17th Century, who chose to fight for their independence, for the former Soviet republics, especially those of southern peripheries, independence came reluctantly. None of the "istans" were ready for it, but they declared their separation one after another, effectively bringing the collapse of the empire to its completion.

If recent Olympic achievements are any indication, Kazakhs have fared better than their cousins in Central Asia since the end of Soviet rule in the region. Interesting to note that people whose ethnonym carries the most nomadic meaning, as qazaq means "wanderer" in Turkic languages, should be more progressive as independent country, while the earliest sedentary people, i.e. Tajiks, should behave so barbarically as to wage war with their own kind (both immediately after the declaration of independence and as recently as a month ago). I never liked politics and Soviet history is current events for me; it is not past enough, as the effects of the entire regime can still be felt throughout the current republics. For that reason, I find it difficult to talk about it all, and prefer to write about the ancient histories of the people who inhabit Central Asia. But the events of summer of 1991 are imprinted on my mind forever for several reasons, so perhaps I will comment on this after all.

Most immediate result of the independence was the need for each people to have individualized identities. Under the Soviet rule, there was one history for all fifteen republics, with the pre-1920s histories rarely discussed publicly or positively. Since 1991, every republic in Central Asia has been re-writing its own myth of origin and defining its identity. The paradox, for me, is how far everything is from reality, with the late Turkmenbashi's Ruhnoma as the most obvious example. In search of their identity, each republic began building of mosques in order to connect the people with their Muslim past. Interestingly, presidents of each of the republics kept the Soviet style of ruling, rather than returning to the old forms of emirates or khanatas. 

In the case of Tajikistan, the government searched in the 10th Century of what it came to call the Tajik identity. The year 999 (I bet numerologists are having a field trip with this) was the end of the Samanid rule, last Iranian speaking dynasty in the region, whose capital was in Bukhara. This period actually marks the formation of Tajik cultural identity, with the earliest known use of the word "tajik" and the completion of Shohnoma of Firdawsi, the book of origins of the Iranian peoples. Ironically, the 10th Century of modern era (BC, BCE, etc.) also marks the end of Sogdian culture in the region, where this ancient language is replaced completely by the Persian language infused with Arabic script. 

After numerous houses of prayers, building of statues seemed to be the next obvious choice for the newly independent republics.  The saddest thing in search of identity was the Tajik government's building of statue of the most prominent Samanid ruler in the capital of Tajikistan, whose face, as people noticed, oddly looks like the current president's. People are becoming aware of their past, but to built a large statue, with golden crown at the time when most of the population is in dire poverty is negligence in direct sense of the word. Ismoil Somoni was known to have been a good ruler and people of his domain stood on his shoulders; thousand years later, descendants of Somoni's subjects carry their president on their backs, young and old alike.

There is a statue of Amir Timur in Samarqand who is sitting on a throne with his menacing gaze onto the main boulevard of the city. Another statue of Timur riding a horse stands on a square in Tashkent. Karimov, the president of Uzbekistan, did not do what his neighbor did and make the face of Amir Timur look like his own, but he did sanction the building of the statues for the same reason. That is to say to establish the Uzbek identity by linking it to a well known historical figure. Amir Timur is indeed well known in the region, and around the world; who doesn't know Tamerlane? Even Chaucer wrote about him, so did Poe. But what is so bad about linking Tamerlane with the Uzbek people?

For one, Tamerlane was not Uzbek at all, he was only born on the territory of Uzbekistan. Timur was a Mongol from a clan known as Barlas. They were related to the Borjigin into which young Temujin was born, who later came to be known as Chingizkhan. Timur admired Chingizkhan so much that he wanted to be just like the Mongol conqueror, this was one reason several of his wives belonged to the Chingizkhanid house. Mongolian rulers were chosen by a kuriltai, a form of a nomadic council not unlike the modern majlis. Timur was never able to attain the full vote of the council, as he was not a direct descendant of Chingizkhan. So he humbly accepted the title of amir rather than khan, where the former is a subordinate to the latter.

In reality, Timur's militaristic abilities were unparalleled at the time, so he could have easily call himself Khan Timur. He had other abilities to be admired or despised, but the point I am trying to make is that his empire was overrun by the nomads from the north. They called themselves Shaybans, descendants of the fifth son of Jochi, the eldest son of Chingizkhan. Shaybanids, as they came to be known after they formed their kingdom over that of Timurids, were the "original" Uzbeks. That the president of Uzbekistan chose to built a statue to Amir Timur (Mongol) and not to the earliest known Uzbeks is a paradox to me (Uzbeks are also Mongols, but this is best left for another post). Karimov's choice is even more striking because almost no Uzbek I know will want to be associated with the Mongols, but they will admire the achievements of a figure without knowing who exactly Timur was. As 25% Uzbek (there's my mathematical inclination again), I admire Chingizkhan more than Amir Timur, and prefer calling the latter Tamerlane.

This post may seem like ranting of a mad student, but when I learned about the late Turkmenbashi's building of a statue in his own liking, made of gold, I can't think of any sensible person who wouldn't go mad at such news. The statue has been removed by the new president of Turkmenistan, but at one point it showed the "Father of Turkmen" pointing to the sun as it rotated. There are many such examples of selfish extravagant behavior exhibited by the leaders of Central Asian republic, and it depresses me every time I think about them all. So, I rather continue talking about ancient histories of our people, something that we can find useful for our future.

The last thing I will say is that I admire the achievements of the Kazakh people, even if those achievements were due to "better" geography. I also take my hats off to the Kyrgyz, who upon being dissatisfied with their president, ousted him from his position (I can't say I have a positive view of the events in Osh in 2010 between the Kyrgyz and Uzbeks). The poet Saadi once wrote that "only his name remains of the Tyrant," so we can only hope. May we all have the strength and patience of our ancestors.

Purely Mixed People

I remember reading an article six years ago about placards of redesigned swastikas on the streets of Dushanbe. I think that was the president's idea of "getting back to our roots," when he had announced the year 2006 as the year of the Aryans. Yes, Tajiks are one of the few people on this globe who can trace their ancestry to the Aryans. But what does it mean? It is interesting to note that the few remaining veterans of the WWII protested to the president Rahmonov's announcement. And why wouldn't they? After all, they fought against a nation whose twisted pride was symbolized by swastika. Hitler ruined it for everyone when he took a peaceful symbol and turned it into an image which most people fear or associate with hatred.

There are a lot of individuals today who still think of themselves belonging to the "pure people," and some of those come from the same part of the world where I was born. Somehow, by trying to prove who was first, people believe themselves to be flawless, authentic, or better than the rest. The idea is preposterous to me, especially in our modern globalized world.

Central Asia Proper with territories adjacent to it, is home of the five republics of former Soviet Union. Each of the republics, namely, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, represent five major ethnic groups in the region. But the region is not limited to these five groups, with some republics comprising autonomous regions whose people did not attain level of independence under the Soviets. If we go back far enough in time, we can see that none of the five major ethnic groups were actually "first" on the scene.

The earliest settlers of Hissar Valley included groups of people, whose remnants include Burushaski people of northern Pakistan. The ancestors of Burushaski people were indigenous to the region, as the Georgians are to Caucasus. Their language does not belong to any known family groups, such as Indo-European or Altaic. (The linguists proposed this theory, and based on the known living and dead languages, this seems to hold ground. However, if the countries of the region stopped their bickering and allowed archeologists to do their work, we'd have a more concrete proof of this theory.)

Some three thousand years ago, a large group of horse riding nomads arrived into the Central Asian region. That the Burushaski who currently occupy the northern regions of Pakistan, a region to be precise only a mountain away from Tajikistan, indicates that the arriving horseman pushed the natives of the land further south. This does not necessarily mean an aggressive push. Linguists have shown that the Burushaski language has many loan words from the newcomers; these words (namely father, mother and grandfather, just to name a few) indicate that ancestors of Burushaski lived a substantial amount of time alongside the new settlers. It is hardly plausible that the natives would adopt the language of the newcomers if the latter were aggressors. Rather than being pushed away from their homeland, a most likely scenario shows the absorption of the Burushaski's forefathers into the society of horse riders. The much larger number of the newcomers would turn them into the overlords of the native population, which would allow for the amalgamation of the two peoples.

An acronym PIE stands for Proto-Indo-European[1], and it indicates a very large group of people who at one point spoke a single language from which many modern languages sprung. The exact "homeland" of the PIE is not known, but suffice it to say, it is somewhere in the middle of a large region between India and Europe. Since PIE did not leave any written records, most likely because writing was yet to be invented, they are known only by a language they may have used to communicate and not by a specific ethnic designation. After a millennium or so of existence, the PIE grew very large in size and naturally began to break away into smaller groups[2]. One of the groups went towards the Mediterranean, and eventually would have become Hellenes, the ancestors of modern Greeks. Another group would become ancestors of the Germanic and Slavic tribes. And yet another group moved toward Central Asia, and are known today as Proto-Indo-Kafiri-Iranians[3]. The acronym PIKI indicates that this group spoke a single language from which three more sprung. The Indians' and Iranians' current location is well known, but the Kafiri language speakers do not currently have a self-designated home, like their cousins. They mostly live in eastern Afghanistan, and are also known as Nuristanis (perhaps a separate post will be dedicated to them later).

When the PIKI broke off from the PIE, it took them approximately a millennium to reach Central Asian region. By 3500 BC, wild horse was domesticated by the PIKI, and another split of the group occurred into: Proto-Indians, Proto-Kafiri, and Proto-Iranians. By the 1st millennium BC, the Proto-Iranians would further divide into numerous ethnic groups, whose names begin to appear in written records of the earliest known civilizations. These were mainly western Iranians, such as Medes and Persians and eastern Iranians such as Scythians, Sogdians, and Bactrians. When a group of equestrian nomads arrived in Central Asia and met the local Burushaski people, they could still be generically called Proto-Eastern-Iranians (PEI).

The Hissar Valley of Tajikistan is one of the known sites of the ancestors of Burushaski, but their actual homeland may have included the entire region of Central Asia Proper as well as territories on both sides of the rivers, i.e. Amu and Syr. When the PEI arrived into Central Asia Proper, some of them began creating permanent settlements. By this time, written records begin to identify groups of PEI with a specific designation, since once they settled their immobility allows other settled people to locate and interact with them. 

One such settlement was called Samarkand, and it was populated by the PEI who called themselves Sogdians. The cousins of Sogdians lived beyond Syrdarya, on the steppes, and they were known as Skuthoi to the Greeks, Saka to the Persians, and Sai to the Chinese; in Russian scholarship the term is Скифы and in English they are known as Scythians. A linguistic connection has been made between the Scythians and Sogdians, both of which mean "archer" in PEI language.

All the confusing acronyms aside, by the time Persians established their Haqamanish dynasty, which was roughly 550 BC, Sogdians had already established themselves in Central Asia Proper. It has already been mentioned that the natives, from whom Burushaski descended, borrowed many words from the early Sogdians. But the Sogdians also borrowed words from the natives.

Burushaski word for water is ts.hil, which the Sogdians pronounced Sil and the word eventually became Sir. This word exist today as name of the river, Syrdarya. That both Sogdians and Proto-Burushaski borrowed words from each other indicates that both of these societies mixed with each other since the first contact. Already here, one can see that the word "pure" cannot be applied to the earliest settlers of the Central Asia Proper. But if this does not convince the modern natives of CAP, perhaps the following may change their minds.

The Tajiks claim descend from the Sogdians, as the latter is the earliest known group of people who spoke an Iranian language. But the word Tajik has nothing to do with the word Sogdian. Just how the Iranian speaking Sogdians came to be known as Tajiks is a story better left for another post. But it ought to be mentioned here that the change of name occurred during a merge of another foreign group of people with the locals. The last trace of "true" Sogdians has survived in a group known in Tajikistan as the Yaghnobi people; their population, which numbers in less than ten thousand, is dwindling away, as the new generation goes out of the community in search of work and eventually mingles with the others.

The Sogdians, ever since they settled in Central Asia Proper and absorbed the local Proto-Burushaski people into their own society, have been in contact with numerous other new comers. To mention every minor group of nomads who passed through CAP would require more time and space. However, a general mention of major groups, whose influence on the Sogdian society is more noticeable than those of minor nomads would be sufficient to make a point.

The Persians under the Achaemenids were first; the second cousins to Sogdians, they occupied the region and turned it into one of their satraps. After them came the Greeks under their Macedonian conqueror. If there is ever doubt that both Persians and Greeks influenced the local society, one but has to look at the names of the cities. Cyrus the Persian built a town near Syrdarya and named it Kurushkatha (sometimes rendered as Kureskhata), which the Greeks called Cyropolis. When Alexander arrived to the same location, he built his own town next to the Persian one and named it, Alexandria Eskhata, which translates as "The furthest city of Alexander." Both of these cities are part of modern Khujand (Leninobod of the Soviets).

After the Persians and Greeks, came another group, whose name in Chinese sources is recorded as the Yuezhi. That the Chinese had a record of this people indicates the direction from which they came into CAP. The Yuezhi were also of Indo-European descent, and their horses would reach as far as India, from where they eventually established a ruling dynasty known as Kushans. The territory of Kushans streched from northern India to Ferghana Valley, thus encompassing Sogdian lands.

The next rulers of the region were another Iranian speaking people known as Parthians, from whose name the Tajiks have the word pahlavon meaning "hero, brave." Parthians did not actually control the Sogdian lands, as their rule paralleled, to some degree, those of the Kushans. However, Tajik scholars call their language zaboni Pahlavi, which translates as "language of Parthians." Tajik is not exactly related to Parthian, but the influence of the latter on the former is very heavy, with many Tajik words having roots in Parthian.

The Parthians were replaced by the Sassanids. They too were of Iranian descent, but unlike the Parthians, the Sassanids (sometimes rendered as Sassanians) had a direct control of the Sogdian lands. If Parthians, without controlling the Sogdian domains had influenced their language and culture, imagine what sort of influence the Sassanids had with their direct rule of the lands. There are more personal names in Tajik language which come directly from the Sassanids, such as Bahrom, Khurshed, or even Anushervon (a name I gave my own son).

Now, one may question how much of a change one Iranian folk could have over another, for after all, Persians, Kushans, Parthians, and Sassanians were all of the same stock. But one ought to realize that if the Sogdians arrived onto the Proto-Burushaski lands and mingled with them before identifying themselves as Sogdians, then every other Iranian people who came to rule over the Sogdians did so after having lived in a given location, for a certain period of time, mixing with other indigenous population, and then identifying themselves with a specific ethnonym. So, each cousin, close or distant, of the Sogdian people arrived to them already mixed with some other blood. So, if one thinks the Sogdians were pure Aryans before the coming of Arabs, then one ought to redefine the meaning of "pure people."

Additionally, the Greeks had a substantial influence on the Sogdian society and its people (not to mention the language, i.e. Tajik word qalam, which means pen/pencil comes from Greek kalamos). But if all the mingling of the Sogdians with other people between 500s BC and 700 AD is not sufficient, then consider the great changes brought about by the Arabs, Turks, Mongols, and Russians since the 8th Century to the present. Rendering ourselves as "pure" becomes useless activity. Instead, we should embrace all the new changes to our culture, and enjoy the benefits that come with it. It would be arrogant to think that one group of people could go far without interaction with another. But most importantly, it is simply foolish to designate oneself Aryan without knowing the full extent of the word (see [3] below).

I think I wrote more than enough for this post. Whoever reads this, I welcome your comments, questions, and criticism.

[1] Prefix proto- means "first."

[2] Harmatta: The separation of the Indo-European groups of languages had to take place at a time when agriculture began to develop in eastern Europe, that is, in the beginning of the sixth millennium B.C. as shown by the fact that the western Indo-Europeans and the eastern group (represented mainly by the Indo-Iranians) have no common agricultural terminology. (357 in HOCOCA-I).

[3] Linguists often abbreviate the term Proto-Indo-Kafiri-Iranian into PII (with Proto-Indian as PIn and Proto-Iranian as PIr as separate branches of PII). They often leave out the word Kafiri, perhaps due to the fact that the Kafirs are smaller in number, and have no had as greater influence on others as their cousins Indians and Iranians. The term Aryan comes from the word "ārya-" which was a designation of the aristocracy in both tribal societies of later Indians and Iranians. Aryan never was an indication of entire ethnic group of people, but rather a title of a ruling elite in society; it is a social term, not ethnic.

Layout of the land

Often, when I draw a map in order to talk about the region of my birth, I begin with a triangle. It is rudimentary, of course, as I am no cartographer. I draw two squiggly lines; one from the bottom left corner of the triangle going upward 45 degrees and another from the top corner going to the same general direction slightly bowed as if the triangle doing the reversed "C" from the "YMCA" song. The two squiggly lines are connected by a circle which looks like a 2 year old drew it. On the left of this imperfect geometrical art form stands a large oval shape.

 

The triangle is the Pamir mountains, of course. The squiggly lines are rivers Amu and Syr that flow from the Pamirs, and the child's circle is the Aral Sea. The oval shape is none other than the Caspian Sea, home of the costliest fish eggs in the world. The land between the mountain, two rivers and the sea is what I call "Central Asia Proper." Of course, CAP is as artificial as the notions of borders and nationalities, but on this later. 

The Pamirs are the highest mountains of the region, comprising of some of the highest peaks in the world. In fact, they are part of a chain of mountains that separate the entire Eurasian Steppe from the Indian sub-continent; these are, mainly Tian Shan of China (which are in turn part of the Himalayan range), the Hindukush (literally "killer of Indians" in Persian languages; same as Pairi Uparisaena of Avesta, which the Greeks called Paropamisus, both of which meant "higher than the eagle"), and the Altai range.

Rivers Amu and Syr are locally known as Amudaryo and Syrdaryo, as daryo is Tajik for river. The Arabs who brought Islam to the region, called the rivers Jaihun and Seihun, and for the ancient Greeks they were known as Oxus and Jaxartes, respectively. Of all these four foreign names for rivers, Oxus is my favorite. It is Greek corruption of the word vakhsh* (vaakhshu = oxus), which is the name of the major tributary of Amudaryo. It's an ancient word, with its roots in Avesta and Sanskrit. The river Vakhsh cuts through Tajikistan from northeast to southwest; it begins as Surkhob, literally "red water" from Tajik surkh (red) and ob (water), from the Pamirs. But Vakhsh is also a name of an ancient settlement, birthplace of my favorite poet Rumi, the founder of whirling dervishes.

Central Asia Proper was Transoxiana for the ancient Greeks and Mawara-un-nahr for the Arabs, both of which essentially mean "land beyond the river." The region had a name of its own given to it by the Soviets. Центральная Азия (Tsentral'naya Aziya) literally means "Central Asia" while Средняя Азия (Srednaya Aziya) means "Middle Asia," but for the common Russian speaker of the Soviet Union, both meant the same thing. That is to say, that part of the USSR which included the republics of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan. Some historians of the region will include Mongolia and Afghanistan, and others even add Uighur Autonomous Region which is in western China, and few erroneously add the Caucasus region of the western Caspian Sea (Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Georgia). Another archaic name of the region is Turkestan, literally "land of the Turks," but for the post-Soviet westerners, the region is simply known as "that part of the world with 'stan' countries."

To clarify, the suffix -iston* in Tajik language denotes a location, and it has the same root as the verb istodan, that is "to stand," incidentally so does the same English verb. Thus, Tajikistan translates as "place where Tajiks stand" or "land of the Tajiks." Every country in the region with the ending istan identifies a specific people with a given location; Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Afghanistan. All except Pakistan, for there is no such ethnic group of people as the "Paki." Pakistan was created out of the western British India, as soon as that colony gained its independence. The word pok in Tajik language means pure, same as in Urdu, the official language of Pakistan, to denote "pureness" of the Muslim population of India from those of Hindus; the activities of the Pakistan government in the past three decades proves them to be far from being "pure." However, "paki" in Pakistan is actually an acronym for those regions of India which separated from the former British colony, the first one being Punjab.

When the Soviets were creating their empire in the 1920s, Tajiks were initially part of the Uzbek SSR, as autonomous region. Having gained qualifications for a separate republic, which among several things included a written language and an academy of science, they became Tajik Soviet Socialist Republic. Interestingly, Moscow government would allow UzSSR to keep two of the oldest cities in Central Asia Proper, namely Samarqand and Bukhara, a point of contention to this day between the two countries. Both Samarqand and Bukhara were founded by ancestors of Tajiks, and to this day Uzbeks constitute a minority in those cities. Tajikistan in its turn does not comprise entirely of the Tajiks, with its northern cities populated by Uzbeks. So, in this case, neither Uzbekistan nor Tajikistan are actually places of their respective people.

Amudaryo and Syrdaryo are to Central Asia as Tigris and Euphratis to Mesopotamia (Iraq), Nile to Egypt, Yellow and Yangtze Rivers to China, and Ganges and Indus to India. As water is the essential part of human kind, the earliest settlements are to be found near rivers. But why exactly is this region called "central"? In relations to older "civilizations," mainly Egyptian and Mesopotamian in the west, Chinese in the east and Indian in the south, what I call CAP is located right in the middle of the aforementioned peoples. Buddhism passed through this area from India in order to reach China, while the hordes of nomadic peoples from the direction of China made their way to what is better known as Middle East (another vaguely artificial term) and Europe. Merchants always stopped in the region on their way to and from the civilizations in the periphery; in fact, the earliest and the best known merchant colonies were founded by the locals, i.e. Sogdians, all over the Silk Route. 

Before I end this post, there are few other geographical features to be mentioned. Southeast of the Aral Sea, between Amu and Syr rivers lies a desert, known for its red sands; its Turkic name, Qizil Kum, means just that. On the west side of Amudarya, Kara Kum desert stretches until the Caspian Sea; one of the meanings of the Turkic word kara means black, which is not so much a description of the color of the sands but the harshness of the desert itself. Due to extensive irrigations during the Soviet rule of its tributaries, the "circular" Aral Sea now resembles a reverse archipelago, having shrunk into smaller lakes. There are also valleys that dot the Central Asia Proper. Ferghana Valley is the largest of its kind in the region, and it is located at the skirt of the Pamirs nearest to Syrdarya. Dushanbe, the capital city of Tajikistan, lies in Hissar Valley, one of the early settlements of the region, whose indigenous population were pushed by the ancestors of Tajiks.

*Девонақулов: Ин калима яке аз беҳтарин ёдгориҳои қадимаи мардуми мост, зеро ки нишонаи забони авестоиву паҳлавӣ буда бо ӯ Куруши Кабир, Ардашери Бобаконy Баҳроми Сосонӣ гуфтугӯ менамуданду сиёсатмадорӣ мекарданд.

*iston can also be used in figurative speech, as had been done by many poets; Sherazi's Buston ("place of fragrance") and Guliston ("garden of roses") are examples of his best work.

Past vs. History

To borrow the words of my professor "Past is everything that has happened. History is what we choose to write about the past." The two keywords are "choose" and "write". History as discipline may have had its beginnings with Herodotus, but human written records precede the Greek historian, who lived in the 400s BC, by a good millennium, or two, or even three. Herodotus did not write about everything. He chose what to write about: a place, time period, a battle or two, his own experiences, but not everything. It's impossible to write about everything that happened.

Anything that took place before our earliest written records is considered pre-history, which is the realm of archeology. When it comes to studying Central Asian history, there are many gaps in written records, and archeology fills those gaps to some degree. But I am neither an archeologist, nor will I write anything comprehensive from the earliest times that ever happened in Central Asia. The main reason for this blog is to record the things I learn, so I can always comeback when I forget them. I forget a lot these days. Maybe I will write a book one day, but I have come to realize that over ambitious endeavors rarely see the light of day.

I am a student of history, which means I only know so much. At home, everyone comes to me with history questions, outside, I go to everyone with questions of my own. It all began with a video game, my interest in history, that is. Not satisfied with the game, I picked up a book. It was Yan's Chingiskhan; a very good trilogy, which took the reader back into the times of the Mongol domination of the world in 13th Century. Yan wrote during the Soviets, so in addition to Chingizkhan being a novel, it is also very "one sided." Nonetheless, I learned a lot from this book, and afterward my appetite grew for history.

Before I start blogging (omg, did I just write that?), a short paragraph about myself would be a good introduction. My name is Jahongir and I was born in Dushanbe, Tajikistan. I grew up in a diverse city, among the Russians and Jews; my mother's good friend was Korean; I lived only ten minutes from a "German town" and there were a lot of Uzbeks in my neighborhood. Religion did not play any part in my early childhood. On my 10th birthday, Soviet Union collapsed, but I did not know it then. All of a sudden, there was a need for identification, and I became a Muslim boy. I learned how to recite verses from the holy book by heart; when my "teacher" opened a page, I read it clearly and loudly, without knowing what it was that I read. To this day, I doubt the mullo who instructed us knew the meaning of the verses himself. My maternal great grandmother's name was Gulchehra Baqoeva, she was born in Bukhara to Jewish parents. My paternal grandfather was born in Qoqand, he was Uzbek, as is evident for his name, Meliquzi. Both my maternal grandfather and my paternal grandmother were of Tajik descend. If I were into mathematics, I would say I am 50% Tajik, 25% Jewish and 25% Uzbek, but whoever identifies themselves in numbers?

On July 21, 1997, I arrived to New York City with my mother and younger brother. We settled in Brooklyn, and have been living here ever since. Brooklyn is a great place, and a second favorite place of my study area. After 10 years of going back and forth, I finally graduated from Brooklyn College in 2009 with BA in history. I am back in school for my master's and who knows how long that will take to complete. In the meantime, this blog will be a repository of things I learn.

Whoever reads this, you are welcome to ask me questions about the things I write or correct me when you believe I am wrong. I never liked saying goodbye or knew how to end things gracefully, so until next post.....